Meta Searching: The good, the bad & the ugly
Derek Taylor
First, a definition.
Confused? Let me give you an example. Let's say there is a meta search engine you have recently found that searches two engines, let's say Google and Yahoo. It searches both of these search engines and then returns the combined results to you, without any duplicates (results that appear on both engines). Sounds neat , huh? Well, there are pros and cons with meta searching that the user should be aware of in order to make his searching as productive as possible.
The Pros of
Meta searching is fast, and saves considerable time for the user since you may query several engines and directories simultaneously rather than typing in a single query in every search engine that you wish to get results. Webmasters will find meta searching extremely valuable in checking their site's page listings, backlinks, keyword ranking, and other site statistics in several search engines. Other professions that are research-oriented would also benefit greatly from meta searching. Professions such as educators, scientists, legal professionals, college students to name just a few.
The Cons of
Most, not all, meta searchers do not allow site submissions. This is because most do not maintain their own database of page listings. They simply get results from other search engines. Because most meta searchers query anywhere from 4 to 12 engines and directories simultaneously, and not all of them will allow Boolean searching, many meta searchers therefore will not allow Boolean searching. (Boolean seaching is the use of operators such as AND, OR, quotation marks, and plus/minus symbols.)
The
Standard
These are some "oldies but goodies." The following list includes some notable examples of standard meta search engines, many of these having been around for years and have remained quite popular with the searching public.
Dogpile - Excite - Hunt It Out - IxQuick - Mamma - MetaCrawler - MetaSearch - MetaEureka - Search.com - WebCrawler - WindSeek - Vivisimo - ZapMeta
Below you will find some excellent examples of newer meta search engines. Many include nifty features for advanced searching, such as clustering. Clustering search engines gather results into groups around a certain theme, or in some cases just provide you with related keywords that perhaps will aid the user to zero in on your goal. Others offer the user the ability to set the bias of each search engine the meta searcher pulls results from. For example, telling it to weigh results more from Yahoo than from Ask Jeeves.
Clusty - ez2find - Ithaki - Izito - Kartoo - KillerInfo - Mooter - Turbo10 - Nuah - Ujiko - WebClust
All-In-One Search Pages
Below you will find some excellent examples of what I call all-in-one search pages. These are not technically meta search engines as they only allow the user to search one engine at a time, but they certainly provide a valuable service to the web searcher.
AllSearches - iTools - Multi-Search-Engine - Port Prophecy - Queryster's SearchX - Search22 - Searchalot
Conclusion: There are several advantages to using meta search engines, the most obvious advantage being the ability to get results from multiple search engines without having to visit each in turn.
Entireweb Newsletter also recommends the new meta search engine Seek2Day which produces great results and blends it with an user-friendly design. Highly recommended - http://www.seek2day.com
About the Author: Derek Taylor is the owner and web designer of Port Prophecy (http://www.portprophecy.com), an all-in-one meta search site that allows the user to choose from hundreds of search engines and directories to query. Mr. Taylor also is a frequent contributor to many forums and bulletin boards on the Internet and donates time editing for human-edited directories.
No comments:
Post a Comment